Love, attention, together with inhibition of advice off romantic options

Love, attention, together with inhibition of advice off romantic options

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and Human Choices, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot out-of attachment inside human mating. Writeup on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Web sites contradiction revisited. Journal off Personal Points, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social technical that decreases social involvement and you can mental really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, time, and you can duration of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Current People Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research off intimacy, welfare, and you can relationship: Comparison the latest assumptions of your triangular theory regarding like. Emotional Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling most useful in the carrying out bad: Personal comparisons in this close dating. Log out of Personality and you will Public Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit knowledge away from romantic rivalry. Diary regarding Identity and Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

An effective. (2001)mitment and you may relationships fix elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to attractive alternatives: Brand new evolved mindset away from relationships repair. Development and you will Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study off dispute and you will agreement during the distressed and nondistressed marital couples. Diary out-of Contacting and you may Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Environmentally friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Matchmaking development on the internet: What’s the large appeal Record regarding Public Products, 58(1), 9–29.

The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and the structure out-of fulfillment inside intimate dating

Neff, L. A good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-assessment aim in intimate dating: A style of all over the world improvement and you may certain confirmation. Inside the P. Noller & J. A beneficial. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents on the examination of couple communications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-specialist thread through the contact out of accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Search, Practice, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new societal monitoring system: Improved sensitivity so you can societal signs since an adaptive reaction to social exclusion. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new social outcast: Ostracism, personal exemption, rejection, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Push.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Globally and you may specific relational models on connection with societal relationships. Record from Identity and you can Societal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will suggestions trying to inside the intimate relationship. Identity and you can Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will certain accessory representations when you look at the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Log Out-of Public And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Within the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Close intimate relationships: Fix and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection in person impact among spouses while the a function of the fresh new resemblance within mutual enjoy. Identification And you may Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience out of extrinsic advantages into the preference and enjoying. Log out-of Identification and you may Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *